Salem, OR – Members of two airport advisory groups voiced concerns on Monday, alleging that city councilors were not provided with essential information when they voted to move forward with the closure of a secondary runway during a February work session.
The advisory groups, which provide insight and recommendations on airport operations and policies, have stated that they were not fully consulted on key aspects of the runway closure proposal, which they believe could have significant implications for airport capacity, safety, and efficiency. According to the groups, the city councilors were unaware of several critical factors, including potential operational disruptions and the impact on air traffic flow, that were not presented during the work session.
The runway in question is used for secondary traffic and emergency landings, and its closure could lead to increased congestion on the primary runway, especially during peak hours. Airport advisory group members have raised concerns that the decision, made without their full input, may compromise the airport’s ability to manage its traffic flow effectively, potentially leading to delays or safety risks.
One member of the advisory group expressed frustration, stating, “We were never given the chance to present all the facts. There were multiple issues we feel were glossed over during the discussions, and now it seems the decision may have been made without fully understanding the consequences.”
City councilors, on the other hand, defend their decision, stating that the runway closure is part of a larger plan to modernize the airport and improve overall operations. They contend that the runway’s closure is a necessary step toward achieving long-term improvements, including upgrades to airport infrastructure that will accommodate increasing traffic volumes in the coming years.
However, the advisory groups are calling for a re-evaluation of the decision, suggesting that a more comprehensive analysis is needed. They are advocating for a full public hearing, where both councilors and advisory members can address the potential impacts and reconsider the runway closure plan with all the available information.
As the debate continues, airport officials have promised to review the concerns raised by the advisory groups and explore ways to mitigate any negative effects that could arise from the closure. A formal response from the city council is expected in the coming weeks.
The situation has sparked wider discussions about the role of advisory groups in municipal decision-making processes, particularly in complex issues that involve both technical expertise and public safety. For now, the future of the secondary runway remains uncertain, with both sides eager to reach a resolution that ensures the airport can continue to function efficiently and safely.
